Audi S6
17 model years from 2007 to 2025, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2007–2025
- Class
- Midsize Cars
- Latest engines
- 2.9L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 16–22 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- ★★★★★ (2018)
- Recalls
- 19 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2013 (41)
- Fewest problems
- 2023
- Interest
- 6,859 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2025 S6 in brief
The 2025 Audi S6 is a midsize car offered with a 2.9L 6-cyl engine, including a hybrid version and all-wheel drive.
It measures about 195 inches long and 74 inches wide on a 115-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 4,495 lb.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 22 MPG combined (19 city / 27 highway), 27% worse than the 2025 midsize car average of 30 MPG, for an estimated $3,750 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 3 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 4 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the electrical system.
The Audi S6 has 17 model years in our data, from 2007 to 2025.
Its most efficient year was 2025 at 22 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 16 to 22 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the engine (69), electrical system (15), power train (13).
Buying used? 2024 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2021 is the year to avoid.
2021 has the most recalls (10); all years together count 19 campaigns and 106 owner complaints.
How the 2007 S6 compares
The 2007 Audi S6 is a midsize car offered with a 5.2L 10-cyl engine and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 16 MPG combined (14 city / 19 highway), 24% worse than the 2007 midsize car average of 21 MPG, for an estimated $5,150 a year in fuel.
About the Audi S6
The Audi S6 is a high-performance variant of the Audi A6, an executive car produced by German automaker Audi. It went on sale in 1994, shortly after the "A6" designation was introduced, replacing the "100" nameplate.
From the Wikipedia article "Audi S6", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2025 S6 pros & cons
Full 2025 details →What's good
- Strong performanceUp to 670 hp, versus about 320 hp for similar 2025 models.
- Hybrid version availableOffered as a hybrid as well as gas.
- Lots of standard safety tech4 of 5 key driver aids standard on the versions we checked.
Watch out for
- Below-average fuel economyBest version gets 22 MPG combined, 27% below the 2025 midsize car average of 30 MPG.
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Best and worst years to buy used
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 9 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Compare head to head
S6 changes by model year
- 2024
- Engine added: 2.9L 6-cyl
- Engine dropped: 2.9L 6-cyl turbo
- 2020
- New hybrid version
- Engine added: 2.9L 6-cyl turbo
- Engine dropped: 4.0L 8-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG up from 18 to 22
- 2018
- Best combined MPG down from 21 to 18
- Now crash-tested by NHTSA: 5 stars overall
- 2013
- New body dimensions, wheelbase +2.8 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Engine added: 4.0L 8-cyl turbo
- Engine dropped: 5.2L 10-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 16 to 20
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 17 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.9L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 194.9 in | 4,495 lb | Not rated | 3 | 4 |
| 2024 | 2.9L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 194.9 in | 4,495 lb | Not rated | 1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2.9L 6-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 194.9 in | 4,495 lb | Not rated | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2.9L 6-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 194.9 in | 4,495 lb | Not rated | 4 | 4 |
| 2021 | 2.9L 6-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 194.9 in | 4,495 lb | Not rated | 10 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2.9L 6-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 194.9 in | 4,495 lb | Not rated | 6 | 2 |
| 2018 | 4.0L 8-cyl turbo | 18 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,398 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 4 |
| 2017 | 4.0L 8-cyl turbo | 21 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,398 lb | Not rated | 2 | 5 |
| 2016 | 4.0L 8-cyl turbo | 21 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,398 lb | Not rated | 2 | 19 |
| 2015 | 4.0L 8-cyl turbo | 20 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,398 lb | Not rated | 2 | 5 |
| 2014 | 4.0L 8-cyl turbo | 20 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,398 lb | Not rated | 3 | 19 |
| 2013 | 4.0L 8-cyl turbo | 20 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,398 lb | Not rated | 3 | 41 |
| 2011 | 5.2L 10-cyl | 16 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,486 lb | Not rated | 2 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5.2L 10-cyl | 16 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,486 lb | Not rated | 2 | 1 |
| 2009 | 5.2L 10-cyl | 16 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,531 lb | Not rated | 3 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5.2L 10-cyl | 16 MPG | 193.7 in | 4,531 lb | Not rated | 2 | 1 |
| 2007 | 5.2L 10-cyl | 16 MPG | 193.7 in | – | Not rated | 2 | 1 |
Alternatives to the 2025 S6
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 BMW 3 Series | 31 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2025 BMW 5 Series | 31 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2025 Mercedes-Benz E-Class | 28 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2025 Lexus IS | 25 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2025 Audi A4 | 29 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2025 Mercedes-Benz C-Class | 29 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Audi. How we calculate this →



