BMW 1 Series
6 model years from 2008 to 2013, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2008–2013
- Class
- Subcompact Cars
- Latest engines
- 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 3.0L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 22–23 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 5 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2011 (27)
The 2013 1 Series in brief
The 2013 BMW 1 Series is a subcompact car offered with 2 engines (3.0L 6-cyl turbo and 3.0L 6-cyl) and rear-wheel drive.
It measures about 172 inches long and 69 inches wide on a 105-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,208 lb (128i 2dr Coupe RWD).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 23 MPG combined (20 city / 28 highway), 5% better than the 2013 subcompact car average of 22 MPG, for an estimated $3,550 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 2 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 3 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the air bags.
The BMW 1 Series has 6 model years in our data, from 2008 to 2013.
Its most efficient year was 2013 at 23 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 22 to 23 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the air bags (37), electrical system (9), fuel/propulsion system (7).
2011 has the most recalls (5); all years together count 5 campaigns and 62 owner complaints.
How the 2008 1 Series compares
The 2008 BMW 1 Series is a subcompact car offered with 2 engines (3.0L 6-cyl and 3.0L 6-cyl turbo) and rear-wheel drive.
It measures about 172 inches long and 69 inches wide on a 105-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,258 lb (128i 2dr Coupe RWD).
2013 1 Series pros & cons
Full 2013 details →What's good
Nothing stands out against similar models in the data.
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Show all 6 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 3.0L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 172 in | 3,208 lb | Not rated | 2 | 3 |
| 2012 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 3.0L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 172 in | 3,208 lb | Not rated | 4 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 3.0L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | 172 in | 3,258 lb | Not rated | 5 | 27 |
| 2010 | 3.0L 6-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 172 in | 3,258 lb | Not rated | 4 | 5 |
| 2009 | 3.0L 6-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 171.7 in | 3,258 lb | Not rated | 3 | 14 |
| 2008 | 3.0L 6-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 171.7 in | 3,258 lb | Not rated | 3 | 13 |
Alternatives to the 2013 1 Series
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Lexus IS | 24 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class | 25 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 BMW X1 | 27 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2013 Lexus CT | 42 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 Acura ILX | 38 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2013 Volvo C70 | 22 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or BMW. How we calculate this →