DecodedCars2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2010 models.
- Class
- Large Cars
- Engines
- 2.7L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.7L 8-cyl, 6.1L 8-cyl
- Drivetrain
- Rear-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Regular Gasoline, Premium Gasoline
- MPG (best)
- 21 combined · 18 city / 26 hwy
- Length
- –
- Curb weight
- –
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- Few owner complaints0 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 110 for similar models.
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 10 similar 2010 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8 is a large car offered with 4 engines (2.7L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.7L 8-cyl and 6.1L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 21 MPG combined (18 city / 26 highway), 14% better than the 2010 large car average of 18.5 MPG, for an estimated $3,200 a year in fuel.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
What changed for 2010
No changes to engines, powertrains, drivetrains, size, EPA ratings or NHTSA crash rating compared with the 2009 300 SRT8 — a carry-over year in the data.
Compared with 2009; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2009 300 SRT8 →
Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 300/SRT-8 | 2.7L 6-cyl | Automatic 4-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 18 / 26 / 21 | +14% | $3,200 | 423 |
| 300/SRT-8 | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 4-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 17 / 25 / 20 | +8% | $3,350 | 444 |
| 300/SRT-8 | 5.7L 8-cyl | Automatic 5-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 16 / 25 / 19 | +3% | $3,550 | 468 |
| 300/SRT-8 | 6.1L 8-cyl | Automatic 5-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 13 / 19 / 15 | -19% | $5,500 | 592 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2010 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8 under the current (2011+) test program.
Similar 2010 large cars
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8 (this car) | 21 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2010 Chevrolet Impala | 22 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2010 Dodge Charger | 21 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2010 Chrysler 300 | 19 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2010 Ford Taurus | 22 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2010 Hyundai Sonata | 25 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2010 Toyota Avalon | 23 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8 is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
No owner complaints for the 2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8 in NHTSA's database since 2015.
Used 2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8 buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2010 Chrysler 300 SRT8. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other 300 SRT8 years
Compare all years →| Year | MPG (best) | Length | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 300 SRT8 | 17 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 300 SRT8 | 17 | 200.4 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 300 SRT8 | 17 | 200.4 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 300 SRT8 | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 300 SRT8 | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 300 SRT8 | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 300 SRT8 | 15 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 300 SRT8 | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Chrysler. How we calculate this →