DecodedCars2009 Mazda B Pickup
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2009 models.
- Class
- Small Pickup Trucks 2WD
- Engines
- 2.3L 4-cyl, 4.0L 6-cyl
- Drivetrain
- Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Regular Gasoline
- MPG (best)
- 23 combined · 21 city / 26 hwy
- Length
- –
- Curb weight
- –
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- Excellent fuel economyUp to 23 MPG combined — 20% better than the average 2009 small pickup truck (19.2 MPG).
- AWD / 4WD available
- Few owner complaints0 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 47 for similar models.
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 6 similar 2009 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2009 Mazda B Pickup is a small pickup truck offered with 2 engines (2.3L 4-cyl and 4.0L 6-cyl) and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 23 MPG combined (21 city / 26 highway), 20% better than the 2009 small pickup truck average of 19.2 MPG, for an estimated $2,900 a year in fuel.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
What changed for 2009
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl
Compared with 2008; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2008 B Pickup →
Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2300 2WD | 2.3L 4-cyl | Manual 5-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 21 / 26 / 23 | +20% | $2,900 | 386 |
| B2300 2WD | 2.3L 4-cyl | Automatic 5-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 19 / 24 / 21 | +9% | $3,200 | 423 |
| B4000 4WD | 4.0L 6-cyl | Manual 5-spd | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | 15 / 19 / 16 | -8% | $4,200 | 555 |
| B4000 4WD | 4.0L 6-cyl | Automatic 5-spd | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | 14 / 18 / 15 | -14% | $4,450 | 592 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2009 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2009 Mazda B Pickup under the current (2011+) test program.
Similar 2009 small pickup trucks
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Mazda B Pickup (this car) | 23 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2009 Toyota Tacoma | 22 MPG | Not rated | 11 |
| 2009 Chevrolet Colorado | 20 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2009 GMC Canyon | 20 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 23 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2009 Nissan Frontier | 21 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2009 Suzuki Equator | 21 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2009 Mazda B Pickup.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2009 Mazda B Pickup is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
No owner complaints for the 2009 Mazda B Pickup in NHTSA's database since 2015.
Used 2009 Mazda B Pickup buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2009 Mazda B Pickup. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other B Pickup years
Compare all years →| Year | MPG (best) | Length | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 B Pickup | 23 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 B Pickup | 23 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 B Pickup | 23 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 B Pickup | 23 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mazda. How we calculate this →