DecodedCars2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2009 models.
- Class
- Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD
- Engines
- 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl
- Drivetrain
- Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Premium Gasoline
- MPG (best)
- 18 combined · 16 city / 21 hwy
- Length
- –
- Curb weight
- –
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 26 similar 2009 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class is a SUV - offered with 3 engines (3.5L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl and 6.2L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 18 MPG combined (16 city / 21 highway), 8% worse than the 2009 SUV - average of 19.5 MPG, for an estimated $4,550 a year in fuel.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
What changed for 2009
- No diesel version any more
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG down from 21 to 18
Compared with 2008; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2008 ML-Class →
Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ML350 | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | Rear-Wheel Drive | 16 / 21 / 18 | -8% | $4,550 | 494 |
| ML350 4matic | 3.5L 6-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | 15 / 20 / 17 | -4% | $4,850 | 523 |
| ML550 4matic | 5.5L 8-cyl | Automatic 7-spd | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | 13 / 18 / 15 | -15% | $5,500 | 592 |
| ML63 AMG | 6.2L 8-cyl | Automatic (S7) | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | 11 / 15 / 12 | -32% | $6,850 | 741 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2009 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class under the current (2011+) test program.
Similar 2009 SUV -s
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class (this car) | 18 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz G-Class | 12 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | 15 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2009 Porsche Cayenne | 16 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2009 BMW X5 | 22 MPG | Not rated | 15 |
| 2009 BMW X3 | 20 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2009 Cadillac Escalade | 20 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
No owner complaints for the 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class in NHTSA's database since 2015.
Used 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML-Class. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other ML-Class years
Compare all years →| Year | MPG (best) | Length | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 ML-Class | 25 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 ML-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 ML-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 ML-Class | 20 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 ML-Class | 22 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 ML-Class | 22 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 ML-Class | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 ML-Class | 21 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 ML-Class | 16 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 ML-Class | 15 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercedes-Benz. How we calculate this →