Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
12 model years from 2005 to 2016, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2005–2016
- Class
- Two Seaters
- Latest engines
- 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl
- Best MPG
- 19–27 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns, all years
- Interest
- 7,061 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2016 SLK-Class in brief
The 2016 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class is a two seaters offered with 3 engines (2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl and 5.5L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive.
It measures about 163 inches long and 71 inches wide on a 96-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,252 lb (Slk 250 2dr Convertible).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 27 MPG combined (24 city / 32 highway), 34% better than the 2016 two seaters average of 20.2 MPG, for an estimated $3,050 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
The Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class has 12 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2016.
Its most efficient year was 2016 at 27 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 19 to 27 MPG.
Buying used? 2016 has the fewest problems in our data.
How the 2005 SLK-Class compares
The 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class is a two seaters offered with 2 engines (3.5L 6-cyl and 5.4L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 19 MPG combined (17 city / 23 highway), 4% better than the 2005 two seaters average of 18.3 MPG, for an estimated $4,350 a year in fuel.
About the Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
The Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class is a compact executive roadster, produced by Mercedes-Benz. It was released in 1996 and was manufactured at the Mercedes plant in Bremen, Germany, until 2020.
From the Wikipedia article "Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2016 SLK-Class pros & cons
Full 2016 details →What's good
- Excellent fuel economyUp to 27 MPG combined — 34% better than the average 2016 two seaters (20.2 MPG).
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Best and worst years to buy used
2016 SLK-Class
0 owner complaints · 0 recalls
None of the 2 model years we compared stands out for complaints or recalls.
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 2 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
SLK-Class changes by model year
- 2016
- Engine added: 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- Engine dropped: 1.8L 4-cyl turbo
- 2012
- Engines added: 1.8L 4-cyl turbo and 5.5L 8-cyl
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 21 to 26
- 2011
- Engine dropped: 5.5L 8-cyl
- 2010
- Engine added: 5.5L 8-cyl
- Engine dropped: 5.4L 8-cyl
- 2006
- Engine added: 3.0L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 19 to 21
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 12 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl | 27 MPG | 162.6 in | 3,252 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1.8L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 162.6 in | 3,252 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1.8L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 162.6 in | 3,307 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1.8L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 162.6 in | 3,307 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1.8L 4-cyl turbo, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 162.6 in | 3,395 lb | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3.0L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl | 21 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3.5L 6-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl, 5.5L 8-cyl | 21 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 3.0L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.4L 8-cyl | 21 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3.0L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.4L 8-cyl | 20 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 3.0L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.4L 8-cyl | 20 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3.0L 6-cyl, 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.4L 8-cyl | 21 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3.5L 6-cyl, 5.4L 8-cyl | 19 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Alternatives to the 2016 SLK-Class
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT | 18 MPG | Not rated | 5 |
| 2016 Porsche Boxster | 25 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2016 Porsche Cayman | 25 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2016 BMW Z4 | 26 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mercedes-Benz. How we calculate this →