Mitsubishi Lancer
13 model years from 2005 to 2017, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2005–2017
- Class
- Compact Cars
- Latest engines
- 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl
- Best MPG
- 24–30 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 15 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2009 (64)
- Fewest problems
- 2017
- Interest
- 19,124 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2017 Lancer in brief
The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is a compact car offered with 2 engines (2.0L 4-cyl and 2.4L 4-cyl) and front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
It measures about 182 inches long and 69 inches wide on a 104-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,142 lb (4dr Sedan AWD Es/Se Ltd/Gts Awc).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 30 MPG combined (27 city / 34 highway), 12% better than the 2017 compact car average of 26.9 MPG, for an estimated $2,250 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 0 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 6 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the air bags.
The Mitsubishi Lancer has 13 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2017.
Its most efficient year was 2017 at 30 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 24 to 30 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the power train (93), engine (48), electrical system (40).
Buying used? 2017 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2015 is the year to avoid.
2010 has the most recalls (7); all years together count 15 campaigns and 350 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Lancer compares
The 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is a compact car offered with 3 engines (2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl and 2.0L 4-cyl turbo) and front-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 181 inches long and 67 inches wide on a 102-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 2,657 lb (4dr Sedan FWD /Es).
About the Mitsubishi Lancer
The Mitsubishi Lancer is an automobile that was produced by the Japanese manufacturer Mitsubishi Motors from 1973 until 2024.
From the Wikipedia article "Mitsubishi Lancer", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2017 Lancer pros & cons
Full 2017 details →What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- Few owner complaints6 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 117 for similar models.
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Best and worst years to buy used
2017 Lancer
6 owner complaints · 0 recalls · 1 crash report
Year to avoid2015 Lancer
26 owner complaints · 2 recalls · 5 crash reports
Most reported: Power Train
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 3 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Lancer changes by model year
- 2016
- Engine dropped: 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- 2011
- Best combined MPG up from 26 to 28
- 2009
- Engine added: 2.4L 4-cyl
- 2008
- Engine added: 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- All-wheel or four-wheel drive now available
- Best combined MPG down from 26 to 24
- 2007
- New body dimensions: 0.8 in shorter, wheelbase +1.5 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Engines dropped: 2.4L 4-cyl and 2.0L 4-cyl turbo
- All-wheel / four-wheel drive no longer offered
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 13 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl | 30 MPG | 181.9 in | 3,142 lb | Not rated | 0 | 6 |
| 2016 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl | 30 MPG | 181.9 in | 3,142 lb | Not rated | 2 | 30 |
| 2015 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 29 MPG | 180.7 in | 2,987 lb | Not rated | 2 | 26 |
| 2014 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 180.7 in | 3,053 lb | Not rated | 2 | 21 |
| 2013 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,120 lb | Not rated | 1 | 11 |
| 2012 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 179.9 in | 3,120 lb | Not rated | 2 | 19 |
| 2011 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 179.9 in | 2,921 lb | Not rated | 4 | 28 |
| 2010 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 26 MPG | 179.9 in | 2,921 lb | Not rated | 7 | 41 |
| 2009 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 25 MPG | 179.9 in | 2,921 lb | Not rated | 7 | 64 |
| 2008 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 24 MPG | 179.9 in | 2,921 lb | Not rated | 4 | 50 |
| 2007 | 2.0L 4-cyl | 26 MPG | 179.9 in | 2,921 lb | Not rated | 2 | 2 |
| 2006 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 26 MPG | 180.7 in | 2,657 lb | Not rated | 4 | 35 |
| 2005 | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 26 MPG | 180.7 in | 2,657 lb | Not rated | 3 | 17 |
Alternatives to the 2017 Lancer
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Toyota Corolla | 34 MPG | ★★★★★ | 3 |
| 2017 Honda Civic | 36 MPG | ★★★★★ | 6 |
| 2017 Honda Accord | 48 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2017 Toyota Camry | 40 MPG | ★★★★★ | 3 |
| 2017 Nissan GT-R | 18 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2017 Toyota Prius | 56 MPG | ★★★★★ | 3 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mitsubishi. How we calculate this →