Subaru Legacy/Outback
13 model years from 2005 to 2017, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2005–2017
- Class
- Midsize Cars, Compact Cars
- Latest engines
- 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 22–29 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns, all years
- Interest
- 11,414 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2017 Legacy/Outback in brief
The 2017 Subaru Legacy/Outback is a midsize car offered with 2 engines (2.5L 4-cyl and 3.6L 6-cyl) and all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 29 MPG combined (25 city / 34 highway), 8% better than the 2017 midsize car average of 26.9 MPG, for an estimated $2,300 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
The Subaru Legacy/Outback has 13 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2017, classed as Midsize Cars, Compact Cars.
Its most efficient year was 2017 at 29 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 22 to 29 MPG.
Buying used? 2017 has the fewest problems in our data.
How the 2005 Legacy/Outback compares
The 2005 Subaru Legacy/Outback is a compact car offered with 3 engines (2.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl and 2.5L 4-cyl turbo) and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 23 MPG combined (20 city / 27 highway), 1% worse than the 2005 compact car average of 23.3 MPG, for an estimated $2,900 a year in fuel.
About the Subaru Legacy/Outback
The Subaru Legacy was a mid-size car built by Japanese automobile manufacturer Subaru from 1989 to 2025. The maker's flagship car, it is unique in its class for offering all-wheel drive as a standard feature, and Subaru's traditional boxer engine.
From the Wikipedia article "Subaru Legacy", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2017 Legacy/Outback pros & cons
Full 2017 details →What's good
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
No weak spots against similar models in the data.
Best and worst years to buy used
2017 Legacy/Outback
0 owner complaints · 0 recalls
None of the 3 model years we compared stands out for complaints or recalls.
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 3 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Legacy/Outback changes by model year
- 2015
- Best combined MPG up from 27 to 29
- 2013
- Engine dropped: 2.5L 4-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG up from 25 to 27
- 2010
- Engine added: 3.6L 6-cyl
- Engine dropped: 3.0L 6-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 22 to 26
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 13 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 29 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 29 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 29 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 27 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.6L 6-cyl | 27 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo, 3.6L 6-cyl | 25 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo, 3.6L 6-cyl | 25 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo, 3.0L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo, 3.0L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo, 3.0L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo, 3.0L 6-cyl | 23 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 3.0L 6-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Alternatives to the 2009 Legacy/Outback
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Toyota Land Cruiser | 15 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2009 Toyota RAV4 | 24 MPG | Not rated | 14 |
| 2009 Honda CR-V | 23 MPG | Not rated | 12 |
| 2009 Toyota 4Runner | 18 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 16 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2009 Hyundai Tucson | 22 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Subaru. How we calculate this →