Makes›Toyota›Matrix

Toyota Matrix

9 model years from 2005 to 2013, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

Model years
2005–2013
Class
Small Station Wagons
Latest engines
1.8L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl
Best MPG
28–29 combined, by year
Latest rating
Not rated
Recalls
6 campaigns, all years
Most complaints
2009 (86)

The 2013 Matrix in brief

The 2013 Toyota Matrix is a small station wagon offered with 2 engines (1.8L 4-cyl and 2.4L 4-cyl) and front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.

It measures about 172 inches long and 70 inches wide on a 102-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,274 lb (4dr Wagon AWD).

EPA rates its most efficient version at 29 MPG combined (26 city / 32 highway), 16% better than the 2013 small station wagon average of 25 MPG, for an estimated $2,300 a year in fuel.

NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.

It has 1 recall campaign on file.

The Toyota Matrix has 9 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2013.

Its most efficient year was 2013 at 29 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 28 to 29 MPG.

Owners most often report problems with the air bags (263), engine (22), electrical system (19).

2010 has the most recalls (4); all years together count 6 campaigns and 323 owner complaints.

How the 2005 Matrix compares

The 2005 Toyota Matrix is a small station wagon offered with a 1.8L 4-cyl engine and front-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.

It measures about 171 inches long and 70 inches wide on a 102-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 2,930 lb (4dr Wagon Base 4WD/Xr 4WD/Xrs).

2013 Matrix pros & cons

Full 2013 details →

What's good

  • Excellent fuel economyUp to 29 MPG combined — 16% better than the average 2013 small station wagon (25 MPG).
  • AWD / 4WD available
  • Few owner complaints0 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 95 for similar models.

Watch out for

No weak spots against similar models in the data.

Matrix changes by model year

  1. 2009
    • Engine added: 2.4L 4-cyl
    • All-wheel or four-wheel drive now available
  2. 2007
    • All-wheel / four-wheel drive no longer offered

Years without a measurable change are left out.

Show all 9 model years side by side
YearLatest enginesBest MPG / rangeLengthWeightOverallRecallsComplaints
20131.8L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl29 MPG172 in3,274 lbNot rated10
20121.8L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl29 MPG172 in3,274 lbNot rated15
20111.8L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl29 MPG172 in3,274 lbNot rated210
20101.8L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl28 MPG172 in3,274 lbNot rated433
20091.8L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl28 MPG172 in2,844 lbNot rated386
20081.8L 4-cyl29 MPG––Not rated212
20071.8L 4-cyl29 MPG171.3 in2,670 lbNot rated241
20061.8L 4-cyl29 MPG171.3 in2,930 lbNot rated352
20051.8L 4-cyl29 MPG171.3 in2,930 lbNot rated184
Best combined MPG by model year — Toyota Matrix
2005: 29 MPG2006: 29 MPG2007: 29 MPG2008: 29 MPG2009: 28 MPG2010: 28 MPG2011: 29 MPG2012: 29 MPG2013: 29 MPG20052007200920112013max 29 MPG

Alternatives to the 2013 Matrix

ModelBest MPG / rangeNHTSA overallRecalls
2013 Nissan Juke29 MPGNot rated2
2013 Scion xB24 MPGNot rated2
2013 Toyota Prius v41 MPGNot rated2

Most common owner-reported problems

Air Bags263
Engine22
Electrical System19
Vehicle Speed Control10
Service Brakes7
Steering7
Unknown Or Other5
Power Train3
Owner complaints by model year — Toyota Matrix
2005: 842006: 522007: 412008: 122009: 862010: 332011: 102012: 52013: 020052007200920112013max 86
Check your VIN for open recalls ↗

Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Toyota. How we calculate this →