Chevrolet Express Passenger
13 model years from 2005 to 2017, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2017
- Class
- Vans, Passenger Type
- Latest engines
- 6.0L 8-cyl
- Best MPG
- 13–15 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 22 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2017 (21)
- Fewest problems
- 2015
The 2017 Express Passenger in brief
The 2017 Chevrolet Express Passenger is a van offered with a 6.0L 8-cyl engine and rear-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 13 MPG combined (11 city / 16 highway), 5% worse than the 2017 van average of 13.7 MPG, for an estimated $5,150 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 6 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 21 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the service brakes.
The Chevrolet Express Passenger has 13 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2017.
Its most efficient year was 2007 at 15 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 13 to 15 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the service brakes (31), electrical system (21), engine (19).
Buying used? 2015 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2016 is the year to avoid.
2013 has the most recalls (8); all years together count 22 campaigns and 131 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Express Passenger compares
The 2005 Chevrolet Express Passenger is a van offered with 2 engines (4.3L 6-cyl and 5.3L 8-cyl) and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 15 MPG combined (13 city / 18 highway), 3% better than the 2005 van average of 14.5 MPG, for an estimated $4,450 a year in fuel.
2017 Express Passenger pros & cons
Full 2017 details →What's good
Nothing stands out against similar models in the data.
Watch out for
- 6 recallsMore than similar models (about 0). Confirm repairs with the VIN.
Best and worst years to buy used
2015 Express Passenger
8 owner complaints · 3 recalls
Year to avoid2016 Express Passenger
15 owner complaints · 6 recalls · 2 fire reports
Most reported: Electrical System
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 3 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Express Passenger changes by model year
- 2016
- Engine dropped: 4.8L 8-cyl
- 2015
- Engine dropped: 5.3L 8-cyl
- All-wheel / four-wheel drive no longer offered
- 2011
- Engines added: 4.8L 8-cyl and 6.0L 8-cyl
- 2007
- Engine dropped: 4.3L 6-cyl
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 13 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 6.0L 8-cyl | 13 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 6 | 21 |
| 2016 | 6.0L 8-cyl | 13 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 6 | 15 |
| 2015 | 6.0L 8-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl | 13 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 3 | 8 |
| 2014 | 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl, 6.0L 8-cyl | 14 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 7 | 12 |
| 2013 | 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl, 6.0L 8-cyl | 14 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 8 | 18 |
| 2012 | 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl, 6.0L 8-cyl | 14 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 6 | 10 |
| 2011 | 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl, 6.0L 8-cyl | 14 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 5 | 8 |
| 2010 | 5.3L 8-cyl | 14 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 5 | 6 |
| 2009 | 5.3L 8-cyl | 14 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 5 | 4 |
| 2008 | 5.3L 8-cyl | 14 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 2 | 5 |
| 2007 | 5.3L 8-cyl | 15 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 11 |
| 2006 | 4.3L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl | 15 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 4 |
| 2005 | 4.3L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl | 15 MPG | – | – | Not rated | 0 | 9 |
Alternatives to the 2015 Express Passenger
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Ford Transit T150 Wagon | 16 MPG | Not rated | 26 |
| 2015 GMC Savana Passenger | 13 MPG | Not rated | 4 |
| 2015 GMC Savana Cargo | 12 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2015 Chevrolet Express Cargo | 12 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Chevrolet. How we calculate this →