GMC Sierra
22 model years from 2005 to 2026, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2005–2026
- Class
- Standard Pickup Trucks 4WD, Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD
- Latest engines
- 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl
- Best MPG
- 17–26 combined, by year
- EV range
- up to 410 mi
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 102 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2015 (915)
- Fewest problems
- 2018
The 2026 Sierra in brief
The 2026 GMC Sierra is a standard pickup truck offered with 4 engines (3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl and 6.2L 8-cyl) and 4-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive.
It measures about 241 inches long and 81 inches wide on a 157-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 4,694 lb (1500 Crew Cab M/Box 2WD).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 25 MPG combined (23 city / 28 highway), 37% better than the 2026 standard pickup truck average of 18.3 MPG, for an estimated $1,100 a year in fuel.
The electric version has an EPA-rated range of up to 410 miles and takes about 11.5 hours to charge on a 240-volt Level 2 charger.
It has 6 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 169 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the engine.
The GMC Sierra has 22 model years in our data, from 2005 to 2026, classed as Standard Pickup Trucks 4WD, Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD.
Its most efficient year was 2025 at 26 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 17 to 26 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the engine (2,271), power train (1,516), electrical system (1,159).
Buying used? 2018 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2015 is the year to avoid.
2015 has the most recalls (23); all years together count 102 campaigns and 9,204 owner complaints.
How the 2005 Sierra compares
The 2005 GMC Sierra is a standard pickup truck offered with 4 engines (5.3L 8-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl and 6.0L 8-cyl), including a hybrid version and rear-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 225 inches long and 80 inches wide on a 144-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 4,987 lb (1500 Crew Cab S/Box).
2026 Sierra pros & cons
Full 2026 details →What's good
- Excellent fuel economyUp to 25 MPG combined — 37% better than the average 2026 standard pickup truck (18.3 MPG).
- Long EV rangeUp to 410 miles on a charge (EPA).
- Electric version availableOffered as a electric as well as gas.
- AWD / 4WD available
Watch out for
- "Do not drive" recallCheck that the recall repair was done before buying or driving.
Best and worst years to buy used
2018 Sierra
371 owner complaints · 12 recalls · 3 fire reports · 10 crash reports
Year to avoid2015 Sierra
915 owner complaints · 23 recalls · 16 fire reports · 33 crash reports
Most reported: Service Brakes
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 10 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Compare head to head
Sierra changes by model year
- 2026
- Longest EV range up from 390 to 410 miles
- 2025
- New body dimensions: 8.2 in longer, wheelbase +11.0 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- New all-electric version
- 2024
- New body dimensions: 3.6 in longer, wheelbase +6.3 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- 2023
- New body dimensions: 11.8 in shorter, wheelbase −17.3 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- 2022
- Engine dropped: 4.3L 6-cyl
- 2020
- New body dimensions: 15.7 in longer, wheelbase +13.0 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- New diesel version
- Engine added: 3.0L 6-cyl turbo
- Best combined MPG up from 21 to 26
- 2019
- New body dimensions: 9.8 in shorter, wheelbase −9.4 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- No hybrid version any more
- Engine added: 2.7L 4-cyl turbo
- 2016
- New hybrid version
- 2014
- New body dimensions: 11.0 in longer, wheelbase +9.4 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- No hybrid version any more
- Engines dropped: 6.0L 8-cyl and 4.8L 8-cyl
- 2013
- Lightest version 183 lb lighter
- 2009
- New hybrid version
- Best combined MPG up from 17 to 21
- 2008
- No hybrid version any more
- Lightest version 558 lb heavier
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 22 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl | 25 MPG | 241.3 in | 4,694 lb | Not rated | 6 | 169 |
| 2025 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 241.3 in | 4,694 lb | Not rated | 4 | 178 |
| 2024 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl | 25 MPG | 233.1 in | 8,640 lb | Not rated | 8 | 538 |
| 2023 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 229.5 in | 4,500 lb | Not rated | 4 | 558 |
| 2022 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 241.3 in | 4,694 lb | Not rated | 8 | 674 |
| 2021 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 241.3 in | 4,694 lb | Not rated | 10 | 668 |
| 2020 | 3.0L 6-cyl turbo, 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl | 26 MPG | 241.3 in | 4,694 lb | Not rated | 16 | 624 |
| 2019 | 2.7L 4-cyl turbo, 5.3L 8-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl | 21 MPG | 225.6 in | 4,863 lb | Not rated | 17 | 729 |
| 2018 | 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl | 20 MPG | 235.4 in | 5,161 lb | Not rated | 12 | 371 |
| 2017 | 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl | 20 MPG | 235.4 in | 5,161 lb | Not rated | 11 | 481 |
| 2016 | 4.3L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl | 20 MPG | 235.4 in | 5,161 lb | Not rated | 13 | 457 |
| 2015 | 4.3L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl | 20 MPG | 235.4 in | 5,161 lb | Not rated | 23 | 915 |
| 2014 | 4.3L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 6.2L 8-cyl | 20 MPG | 235.4 in | 5,115 lb | Not rated | 22 | 814 |
| 2013 | 6.0L 8-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl | 21 MPG | 224.4 in | 5,154 lb | Not rated | 7 | 195 |
| 2012 | 6.0L 8-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl | 21 MPG | 224.4 in | 5,154 lb | Not rated | 6 | 161 |
| 2011 | 6.0L 8-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl | 21 MPG | 224.4 in | 5,154 lb | Not rated | 9 | 386 |
| 2010 | 6.0L 8-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl | 22 MPG | 224.4 in | 5,154 lb | Not rated | 5 | 185 |
| 2009 | 6.0L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl | 21 MPG | 224.4 in | 5,154 lb | Not rated | 6 | 245 |
| 2008 | 4.3L 6-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl | 17 MPG | 224.4 in | 5,148 lb | Not rated | 6 | 418 |
| 2007 | 4.3L 6-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl, 5.3L 8-cyl | 17 MPG | 224.8 in | 4,987 lb | Not rated | 6 | 288 |
| 2006 | 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl | 17 MPG | 224.8 in | 4,987 lb | Not rated | 0 | 68 |
| 2005 | 5.3L 8-cyl, 4.8L 8-cyl, 4.3L 6-cyl | 17 MPG | 224.8 in | 4,987 lb | Not rated | 0 | 82 |
Alternatives to the 2026 Sierra
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Ford F-150 | 24 MPG | Not rated | 8 |
| 2026 Chevrolet Silverado | 25 MPG | Not rated | 7 |
| 2026 Toyota Tundra | 22 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2026 Ram 1500 | 22 MPG | Not rated | 9 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or GMC. How we calculate this →