Mazda CX-7
6 model years from 2007 to 2012, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.
- Model years
- 2007–2012
- Class
- Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD
- Latest engines
- 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.3L 4-cyl turbo
- Best MPG
- 19–23 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 6 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2007 (169)
The 2012 CX-7 in brief
The 2012 Mazda CX-7 is a SUV - offered with 2 engines (2.5L 4-cyl and 2.3L 4-cyl turbo) and front-wheel drive and 4-wheel drive.
It measures about 184 inches long and 74 inches wide on a 108-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 4,008 lb (4dr SUV AWD Gs/GT).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 22 MPG combined (20 city / 27 highway), 5% better than the 2012 SUV - average of 20.9 MPG, for an estimated $3,050 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 4 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 37 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the suspension.
The Mazda CX-7 has 6 model years in our data, from 2007 to 2012.
Its most efficient year was 2011 at 23 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 19 to 23 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the air bags (254), suspension (226), exterior lighting (78).
2010 has the most recalls (5); all years together count 6 campaigns and 608 owner complaints.
How the 2007 CX-7 compares
The 2007 Mazda CX-7 is a SUV - offered with a 2.3L 4-cyl turbo engine and front-wheel drive and 4-wheel or all-wheel drive.
It measures about 184 inches long and 74 inches wide on a 108-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,710 lb.
2012 CX-7 pros & cons
Full 2012 details →What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- Few owner complaints37 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 139 for similar models.
Watch out for
- "Do not drive" recallCheck that the recall repair was done before buying or driving.
CX-7 changes by model year
- 2010
- Engine added: 2.5L 4-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 20 to 23
- Lightest version 210 lb lighter
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 6 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.3L 4-cyl turbo | 22 MPG | 184.3 in | 4,008 lb | Not rated | 4 | 37 |
| 2011 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.3L 4-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | 184.3 in | 4,008 lb | Not rated | 4 | 141 |
| 2010 | 2.5L 4-cyl, 2.3L 4-cyl turbo | 23 MPG | 184.3 in | 4,008 lb | Not rated | 5 | 126 |
| 2009 | 2.3L 4-cyl turbo | 20 MPG | 184.3 in | 3,710 lb | Not rated | 5 | 42 |
| 2008 | 2.3L 4-cyl turbo | 19 MPG | 184.3 in | 3,710 lb | Not rated | 4 | 93 |
| 2007 | 2.3L 4-cyl turbo | 19 MPG | 184.3 in | 3,710 lb | Not rated | 4 | 169 |
Alternatives to the 2012 CX-7
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Toyota RAV4 | 24 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2012 Honda CR-V | 26 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
| 2012 Toyota 4Runner | 19 MPG | Not rated | 8 |
| 2012 Subaru Forester | 23 MPG | Not rated | 15 |
| 2012 Toyota Highlander | 28 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2012 Volkswagen Tiguan | 24 MPG | Not rated | 3 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Mazda. How we calculate this →