DecodedCars2013 MINI Roadster
Trims, performance, features, fuel economy, safety and known problems — with the pros and cons against similar 2013 models.
- Class
- Two Seaters
- Engines
- 1.6L 4-cyl, 1.6L 4-cyl turbo
- Drivetrain
- Front-Wheel Drive
- Fuel
- Premium Gasoline
- MPG (best)
- 30 combined · 27 city / 34 hwy
- Length
- –
- Curb weight
- –
- NHTSA rating
- Not rated
- Recalls
- 0 campaigns
Pros & cons
What's good
- Excellent fuel economyUp to 30 MPG combined — 37% better than the average 2013 two seaters (21.9 MPG).
- No recalls so far
Watch out for
- Premium fuel requiredEvery gasoline version is rated for premium, which raises running costs.
Calculated from EPA, NHTSA and vPIC data against 6 similar 2013 models — not a review. How we calculate this →
Overview
The 2013 MINI Roadster is a two seaters offered with 2 engines (1.6L 4-cyl and 1.6L 4-cyl turbo) and front-wheel drive.
EPA rates its most efficient version at 30 MPG combined (27 city / 34 highway), 37% better than the 2013 two seaters average of 21.9 MPG, for an estimated $2,750 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
There are no recalls or owner complaints on file with NHTSA for this model year.
What changed for 2013
No changes to engines, powertrains, drivetrains, size, EPA ratings or NHTSA crash rating compared with the 2012 Roadster — a carry-over year in the data.
Compared with 2012; trim, feature and price changes aren't covered. See the 2012 Roadster →
Engines, MPG & running costs
| Version | Engine | Transmission | Drive | City / Hwy / Comb | vs. class | Fuel / yr | CO₂ g/mi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper Roadster | 1.6L 4-cyl | Automatic (S6) | Front-Wheel Drive | 27 / 34 / 30 | +37% | $2,750 | 300 |
| Cooper Roadster | 1.6L 4-cyl | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | 27 / 34 / 30 | +37% | $2,750 | 297 |
| Cooper S Roadster | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo | Automatic (S6) | Front-Wheel Drive | 26 / 34 / 29 | +32% | $2,850 | 314 |
| Cooper S Roadster | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | 26 / 34 / 29 | +32% | $2,850 | 305 |
| John Cooper Works Roadster | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo | Automatic (S6) | Front-Wheel Drive | 26 / 34 / 29 | +32% | $2,850 | 314 |
| John Cooper Works Roadster | 1.6L 4-cyl turbo | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | 26 / 34 / 29 | +32% | $2,850 | 305 |
EPA estimates; "vs. class" is combined MPG against the 2013 EPA class average. How we calculate this →
Safety ratings & technology
NHTSA has not published 5-Star ratings for the 2013 MINI Roadster.
Similar 2013 two seaterss
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 MINI Roadster (this car) | 30 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 Mazda MX-5 | 24 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 smart fortwo | 36 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 Nissan 370z | 22 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
| 2013 Honda CR-Z | 36 MPG | Not rated | 2 |
| 2013 MINI Cooper | 32 MPG | Not rated | 1 |
| 2013 MINI John Cooper Works | 29 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
Recalls (0)
No vehicle recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2013 MINI Roadster.
Check your VIN for open recalls at NHTSA ↗Not every 2013 MINI Roadster is affected — only a VIN check confirms your car.
Owner-reported problems
No owner complaints for the 2013 MINI Roadster in NHTSA's database since 2015.
Used 2013 MINI Roadster buyer's checklist
- Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. No recalls on file, but check anyway.
- Before you pay: service records, a history report and an independent inspection.
Generated by DecodedCars from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints for the 2013 MINI Roadster. Not a substitute for a professional inspection.
Other Roadster years
Compare all years →| Year | MPG (best) | Length | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Roadster | 29 | 146.9 in | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 Roadster | 30 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 Roadster | 30 | – | Not rated | 0 | 0 |
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or MINI. How we calculate this →