Buick Regal
10 model years from 2011 to 2020, compared on size, efficiency, safety and reliability.

- Model years
- 2011–2020
- Class
- Midsize Cars, Large Cars
- Latest engines
- 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 3.6L 6-cyl
- Best MPG
- 24–29 combined, by year
- Latest rating
- ★★★★★ (2017)
- Recalls
- 17 campaigns, all years
- Most complaints
- 2011 (238)
- Fewest problems
- 2017
- Interest
- 17,930 Wikipedia views / 30 days
The 2020 Regal in brief
The 2020 Buick Regal is a midsize car offered with 2 engines (2.0L 4-cyl turbo and 3.6L 6-cyl) and front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
It measures about 193 inches long and 73 inches wide on a 111-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 4,096 lb (Sportback).
EPA rates its most efficient version at 26 MPG combined (22 city / 32 highway), 6% worse than the 2020 midsize car average of 27.6 MPG, for an estimated $3,050 a year in fuel.
NHTSA has not published a 5-Star overall rating for this model year.
It has 2 recall campaigns on file and owners have filed 6 complaints with NHTSA since 2015, most often about the tires.
The Buick Regal has 10 model years in our data, from 2011 to 2020, classed as Midsize Cars, Large Cars.
Its most efficient year was 2013 at 29 MPG combined; across all years the best version ranged from 24 to 29 MPG.
Owners most often report problems with the engine (164), electrical system (142), exterior lighting (117).
Buying used? 2017 has the fewest problems in our data, and 2018 is the year to avoid.
2012 has the most recalls (7); all years together count 17 campaigns and 594 owner complaints.
How the 2011 Regal compares
The 2011 Buick Regal is a midsize car offered with 2 engines (2.0L 4-cyl turbo and 2.4L 4-cyl) and front-wheel drive.
It measures about 191 inches long and 73 inches wide on a 108-inch wheelbase, with a curb weight of roughly 3,600 lb.
About the Buick Regal
The Buick Regal is a line of mid-size cars marketed by Buick since 1973. Serving as the premium mid-size/intermediate car of the Buick product range for nearly its entire production, the Regal initially served as the divisional counterpart of the Pontiac Grand Prix and Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme; since the late 2000s, the model line has been derived from the European Opel Insignia. The Regal also serves as the basis of the high-performance Grand National, Gran Sport (GS), and Buick GNX coupes.
From the Wikipedia article "Buick Regal", licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2020 Regal pros & cons
Full 2020 details →What's good
- AWD / 4WD available
- Few owner complaints6 complaints filed with NHTSA versus about 31 for similar models.
Watch out for
- Emergency braking not standardAutomatic emergency braking is optional or limited to some trims.
Best and worst years to buy used
2017 Regal
20 owner complaints · 0 recalls · 1 fire report · 1 crash report
NHTSA overall: ★★★★★
Year to avoid2018 Regal
33 owner complaints · 3 recalls · 5 crash reports
Most reported: Service Brakes
NHTSA recalls and complaints for 6 model years since 2015; use it alongside a pre-purchase inspection. How we calculate this →
Regal changes by model year
- 2018
- New body dimensions: 2.3 in longer, wheelbase +3.5 in — most likely a redesign or new generation
- Engine added: 3.6L 6-cyl
- Engine dropped: 2.4L 4-cyl
- Best combined MPG up from 24 to 26
- 2017
- No hybrid version any more
- Best combined MPG down from 28 to 24
- 2014
- All-wheel or four-wheel drive now available
- Now crash-tested by NHTSA: 5 stars overall
- 2012
- New hybrid version
- Best combined MPG up from 24 to 28
Years without a measurable change are left out.
Show all 10 model years side by side
| Year | Latest engines | Best MPG / range | Length | Weight | Overall | Recalls | Complaints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 192.9 in | 4,096 lb | Not rated | 2 | 6 |
| 2019 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 192.9 in | 4,096 lb | Not rated | 3 | 20 |
| 2018 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 3.6L 6-cyl | 26 MPG | 192.9 in | 4,096 lb | Not rated | 3 | 33 |
| 2017 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 2.4L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 190.6 in | 3,693 lb | ★★★★★ | 0 | 20 |
| 2016 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 190.6 in | 3,642 lb | ★★★★★ | 1 | 41 |
| 2015 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 190.6 in | 3,642 lb | ★★★★★ | 0 | 33 |
| 2014 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 190.6 in | 3,600 lb | ★★★★★ | 2 | 38 |
| 2013 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 29 MPG | 190.6 in | 3,618 lb | Not rated | 6 | 86 |
| 2012 | 2.4L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl turbo | 28 MPG | 190.6 in | 3,580 lb | Not rated | 7 | 79 |
| 2011 | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo, 2.4L 4-cyl | 24 MPG | 190.6 in | 3,600 lb | Not rated | 4 | 238 |
Alternatives to the 2020 Regal
| Model | Best MPG / range | NHTSA overall | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Ford Mustang | 25 MPG | ★★★★★ | 8 |
| 2020 Honda Accord | 48 MPG | Not rated | 6 |
| 2020 Chevrolet Impala | 22 MPG | ★★★★★ | 0 |
| 2020 Toyota Camry | 52 MPG | ★★★★★ | 3 |
| 2020 Chevrolet Camaro | 25 MPG | ★★★★★ | 3 |
| 2020 Nissan GT-R | 18 MPG | Not rated | 0 |
Most common owner-reported problems
Sources: EPA, NHTSA, Transport Canada, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons. Not affiliated with NHTSA, the EPA or Buick. How we calculate this →